top of page

Tired of all the hyper-partisanship?
Let's do something about it!

Our National Conversation

Add paragraph text. Click “Edit Text” to update the font, size and more. To change and reuse text themes, go to Site Styles.

The Savings and Loan Crisis in the United States

Let’s look back to the ‘80s, to a financial crisis that still affects us today. What can we learn?

The United States has long grappled with financial stability, especially saving and borrowing. One of the most harrowing episodes in this regard is the Savings and Loan Crisis of the 1980s. This crisis left an enduring scar on the American economy, illustrating the dangers of financial mismanagement and oversight failures.

The Savings and Loan Crisis, triggered by factors like inflation and high interest rates, saw relief through the Garn-St. Germain Act of 1982. While the act aimed to address deposit rate issues, it inadvertently raised costs and provided aid to those with savings problems. Despite these efforts, financial institutions grappled with challenges, especially in the context of home loans with fixed interest rates (this refers to a situation where the set interest rate doesn't align well with increasing interest rates).

Deregulation allowed struggling entities to persist with Congressional support, and the introduction of supervisory goodwill by the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation aimed to build a positive reputation for improving and recovering from its financial status.

Further alleviation came with the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act (FIRREA) of 1989, which used a significant amount of public money to address failing savings and loan institutions and implement important changes. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act (FDICIA) of 1991 focused on improving the way finances are supervised, implementing stricter rules on lending and increasing the amount of money that banks are required to keep for the Savings and Loan Crisis.

Significant public funds, including bond issuances (borrowing money from investors by selling bonds to fund projects, operations or other financial needs), played a pivotal role in covering closure costs (expenses linked to permanently shutting down a business), taking measures to protect the money that individuals have placed in a bank, and stabilizing financial institutions. These strategies aimed to restore confidence in the financial system, protect depositors and prevent similar crises in the future.

To prevent future financial crises, we can take a few straightforward steps. First, we should limit how much money people can borrow from banks and set clear rules for who can borrow based on factors like education and age. This helps avoid excessive debt and keeps the economy healthier.

Second, we might need to reconsider where we're spending money. Instead of maintaining high spending in certain areas, like welfare programs, we could redirect some of those funds to help people struggling with their finances. This approach involves addressing the root causes of financial problems and investing in education programs to boost people's financial know-how.

In short, a mix of sensible rules and thoughtful social policies can make our financial system more resilient, preventing crises and promoting stability for everyone. I believe that a proactive approach to financial management is crucial for sustaining a stable and secure economic environment.

Even four decades later, the significance of the Savings and Loan Crisis persists. The strategies employed during that time, including limiting excessive borrowing and redirecting funds, continue to offer valuable lessons for maintaining economic stability in the United States. Furthermore, the crisis prompted improvements in financial regulations, supervision and risk management practices within financial markets. Addressing the root causes and implementing these strategies not only prevents the recurrence of similar crises but also plays a pivotal role in restoring public trust during challenging economic periods.

The opinions expressed in this article are those of the individual author.

8 views0 comments


bottom of page