Sign In Subscribe
Hero Banner

|

☰
  • Home
  • News
    • Top Stories
    • US
    • World
    • Elections Polls
    • Business
    • Tech
    • The Media
    • Genz
    • Public Policy
    • AI News
  • Voices
    • Hot Takes
    • Opinions
    • Proposals
    • Influencers
    • Pundits
  • Multimedia
  • Civic Education
  • Get Involved
  • About
    • Contributors
Donate
Home » What Happens When Graduate School Becomes Unaffordable
Economics

What Happens When Graduate School Becomes Unaffordable

Carter LaneBy Carter LaneAugust 15, 2026No Comments4 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp VKontakte Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Photo by Heather Diehl/Getty Images

Limits on federal borrowing may reduce excessive student loan debt. Still, without tackling the underlying issue of rising tuition costs in graduate education, the number of individuals who can obtain these advanced degrees may be reduced.

In 2025, the Working Families Tax Cuts Act, more commonly known as the ‘One Big Beautiful Bill,’ eliminated the Grad PLUS Loan Program. On July 1, 2026, the new federal student loan policy went into effect. This policy reclassified certain advanced degree programs as professional and other graduate programs. Now, you may be thinking to yourself, “I’ve heard this before,” because you have; this is not an unprecedented action done by any presidential administration. 

However, this renaming comes with new features. The Graduate Plus system is now effectively gone, which previously allowed students to fully fund their higher-level degrees by taking out a federal loan to cover the full cost of attendance. This removal and the reintroduction of loan caps have generated significant confusion regarding some graduate programs. For example, nursing programs are classified as non-professional, while theology is otherwise labeled as professional1. These loan caps allow people seeking a professional degree to obtain a max of $50,000 per academic year, with a Lifetime cap of $200,000. Persons seeking a non-professional degree will have access to a $20,500 cap per academic year, with a lifetime cap of $100,000.

The Secretary of Education, Linda McMahon, and her Department said that these unlimited Grad Plus loans contributed to the rising cost of graduate education2. Now the real question: does removing these loans make higher education more affordable or push it further out of reach?

As the fall semester of 2026 approaches, graduate students with limited federal borrowing potential may have to turn to private student loans, which can carry higher interest rates and lack federal borrowing protections—others may choose not to attend at all. We will not yet know the effects of the PLUS Loans’ removal despite the confidence that it will lower tuition. I am not convinced that will work: like many other things in education and labor policy, attendance will drop and the cost of attendance will rise.

If anything, I believe this will put pressure on states to address this situation; some states will continue to push towards affordability, while others will shift to privatization. This will benefit many Americans, but also harm millions of others as their right to education evolves into a luxury. 

This policy was enacted because the U.S. is $1.7 trillion in debt from student borrowers3; they believe this will allow them to shrink the debt while growing it elsewhere. The intent of the policy makes sense, but the execution is poorly done. Using the phrase “common sense governance” seems to mean the easiest option. The federal government should either review each degree program on a case-by-case basis or compel universities to justify each tuition increase, which must be approved, while also centering federal aid on the median cost of a program rather than limiting borrowing potential as a whole. This solves both the increasing tuition costs and prevents students from excessive student loan borrowing. If politicians genuinely want to make graduate education more affordable, then they must address the cost of education—not just limiting students’ ability to pay for it. Students should not have to choose to suffocate under crippling debt for an advanced degree from a public institution. The goal is not to simply reduce student loans, but to foster an education system that makes those loans less necessary.

1U.S. Department of Education. (2025, November 21). Myth vs. fact: The definition of professional degrees. https://www.ed.gov/about/news/press-release/myth-vs-fact-definition-of-professional-degrees

2U.S. Department of Education. (2025, May 13). Fact sheet: The Trump administration is making college more affordable. https://www.ed.gov/about/news/press-release/fact-sheet-trump-administration-making-college-more-affordable

3U.S. Department of Education. (2025, November 21). Myth vs. fact: The definition of professional degrees. https://www.ed.gov/about/news/press-release/myth-vs-fact-definition-of-professional-degrees

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp Email
Previous ArticleAI Causing Layoffs: What to Expect in the Future?
Next Article The Case for Giving America a Moderate Raise
Carter Lane
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

I’m a political science student from Metropolitan State University of Denver, I am policy writer focused on American politics, public policy, and civic engagement.

Related Posts

Universal Basic Income Is Simple. That Is Not Enough.

September 14, 2026

Four Lines That Used to Move Together 

August 31, 2026

Cheaper Burgers, Angrier Ranchers

August 23, 2026

The Case for Giving America a Moderate Raise

August 15, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

HOT TAKES

Yemen: A Crisis Ignored for Far Too Long

October 2, 2026

Teachers’ Unions are the Biggest Bullies at School

September 21, 2026

New Phones Just Aren’t Exciting Anymore

September 17, 2026

9/11: The Start of the Downfall of our Liberties

September 14, 2026
Connect with Us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
Don't Miss
Culture

Susan Sarandon: A Lifetime of Political Activism

By Madison CurdOctober 2, 20260

It was the 1960s in Washington, D.C., and the Vietnam War was running rampant. Susan…

Beyond What Happened: Jack Smith Testifying Before A Senate Committee – Where Does Congressional Oversight Cross the Line?

September 30, 2026

Sanctions for me, but not for thee: A case for increased UN sanctions on Israel

September 29, 2026

AI’s Builders Asked for Brakes. Who Can Actually Apply Them?

September 28, 2026
Subscribe to ONC's Newsletter

Get the latest balanced blend of news, opinion and policy proposals from OUR NATIONAL CONVERSATION. Published weekly.

Our National Conversation

Less Hate. More Debate.

HOME NEWS VOICES MULTIMEDIA GET INVOLVED ABOUT
Donate