Sign In Subscribe
Hero Banner

|

☰
  • Home
  • News
    • Top Stories
    • US
    • World
    • Elections Polls
    • Business
    • Tech
    • The Media
    • Genz
    • Public Policy
    • AI News
  • Voices
    • Hot Takes
    • Opinions
    • Proposals
    • Influencers
    • Pundits
    • Forum
  • Multimedia
  • Civic Education
  • Get Involved
  • About
    • Contributors
Donate
Home » Spoiling for a Fight
Hot Takes

Spoiling for a Fight

Jeff HallBy Jeff HallApril 9, 2025Updated:May 7, 2025No Comments1 Min Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp VKontakte Email
Spoiling for a Fight
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

It seems clear Team Trump wants to crush the traditional role of federal judges.

If a judge offers up a ruling the Trumpsters don’t like, that means that judge is a left wing lunatic, should be impeached — or at a minimum, appealed.

Judges aren’t supposed to set policy. They are there to decide if a proposed measure is lawful or not.

If Team Trump wants to slash payrolls and eliminate agencies, they should ask Congress to vote to approve all that.  Congress is in charge of the purse.

The Republicans in both the House and the Senate are in charge; they can do whatever they want.

If congress took the lead, making Trump’s plans lawful, there wouldn’t be this need for a showdown with the judiciary.

If Team Trump can crush the power of the judiciary, that’s a pretty big step in the direction of authoritarianism.

If the judges are truly trying to set policy, that’s one thing.  But if all they are doing is calling balls and strikes, that’s quite another thing.

It will be interesting to see how the Supreme Court handles all this.

authoritarianism courts supreme court
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp Email
Previous ArticleWelcome to OUR NATIONAL CONVERSATION
Next Article What a Week!
Jeff Hall
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Jeff Hall is a newspaper guy going way back (Kansas City Star, Los Angeles Times, Brentwood News). Like many, he is concerned about how nasty and partisan everything has become. He started OUR NATIONAL CONVERSATION in an attempt to get America talking again.

Related Posts

Social Security’s Future is not Secure

October 19, 2026

My Body, My Choice of Vaccines

October 13, 2026

People Are Pushing Back On Mass Surveillance

October 10, 2026

Young Workers Frozen Out

October 10, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

HOT TAKES

Social Security’s Future is not Secure

October 19, 2026

My Body, My Choice of Vaccines

October 13, 2026

People Are Pushing Back On Mass Surveillance

October 10, 2026

Young Workers Frozen Out

October 10, 2026
Connect with Us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
Don't Miss
Justice & Public Safety

The Gun Debate Is About More Than the Second Amendment

By Felipe CisternasOctober 21, 20260

The debate over gun purchases in the United States is no longer simply a disagreement…

Five Days in the White House: The Rise and Fall of Katie Zacharia

October 20, 2026

King of The Chickenhawks: Why Donald Trump is Nothing More than a Flag-Waving Fraudster

October 19, 2026

Social Security’s Future is not Secure

October 19, 2026
Subscribe to ONC's Newsletter

Get the latest balanced blend of news, opinion and policy proposals from OUR NATIONAL CONVERSATION. Published weekly.

Our National Conversation

Less Hate. More Debate.

HOME NEWS VOICES MULTIMEDIA GET INVOLVED ABOUT
Donate