Sign In Subscribe
Hero Banner

|

☰
  • Home
  • News
    • Top Stories
    • US
    • World
    • Elections Polls
    • Business
    • Tech
    • The Media
    • Genz
    • Public Policy
    • AI News
  • Voices
    • Hot Takes
    • Opinions
    • Proposals
    • Influencers
    • Pundits
  • Multimedia
  • Civic Education
  • Get Involved
  • About
Donate
Home » The Most Satisfactory Voting System
Hot Takes

The Most Satisfactory Voting System

Edward KimBy Edward KimJune 1, 2026Updated:June 1, 2026No Comments2 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp VKontakte Email
Dropping off my ballot
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Each election cycle, there are fears that third party candidates will “spoil” one of the major candidates’ victories due to the dominance of plurality voting. As a result, many localities in Democratic states use ranked choice voting (RCV), and several Republican-dominated Southern states have used runoff elections for decades. These systems can mitigate spoiler effects, but they fail to fully satisfy Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives (IIA). Many states have banned RCV due to the expensive process of counting its complex ballots, which also applies to cardinal voting systems. Even if voting machines were perfect and timely, Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem states that no voting system satisfying IIA also respects unanimous relative preferences of candidate A to candidate B.

But there exists a way to greatly reduce the spoiler effect without an expensive counting process. Approval voting, in which each voter simply casts one equally valued vote for every choice that satisfies them, does not require multiple rounds of counting or any mathematical operation more complex than addition. It may not always elect the candidate that voters would give the highest average rating, but it is probably the best option to ensure the fewest disgruntled voters and calm political polarization. Virtually no places use this system, however, despite its ease of implementability in casual social settings.

Voting
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp Email
Previous ArticleThere in fact is No Difference; We Are Equal and Alike
Next Article Mamdani and the Israel Day Parade
Edward Kim
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

I have been interested in politics ever since the 2016 election, and have always dreamed of becoming a writer and debator!

Related Posts

FIFA’s Questionable Host for 2034

July 20, 2026

Young People Never Stopped Reading

July 20, 2026

The Four Party System

July 18, 2026

The Alleged China Hack

July 17, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

HOT TAKES

FIFA’s Questionable Host for 2034

July 20, 2026

Young People Never Stopped Reading

July 20, 2026

The Four Party System

July 18, 2026

The Alleged China Hack

July 17, 2026
Connect with Us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
Don't Miss
Culture

Why a 3,000-Year-Old Story Is Finding New Readers

By Alan JimenezJuly 20, 20260

For many people, The Odyssey is one of those books they recognize by name but…

To Save Capitalism, Share The Benefits – The Rational Case For Welfare 

July 20, 2026

“Everything is Embarrassing:” Learning to Embrace Cringe

July 19, 2026

Why Independence Isn’t Making Gen Z Happy

July 18, 2026
Subscribe to ONC's Newsletter

Get the latest balanced blend of news, opinion and policy proposals from OUR NATIONAL CONVERSATION. Published weekly.

Our National Conversation

Our National Conversation is a registered 501(c)(3) nonprofit (EIN: 93-1906747)

HOME NEWS VOICES MULTIMEDIA GET INVOLVED ABOUT
Donate